I know. Decades ago, I was instructed that the most viable method for results was, 1. to create a specific intent, 2. work the magic, and then 3. let it go into the universe. “Set it and forget it,” which is hard to do when it requires squelching your desire.
I have heard spell casters blame clients who don’t get results for not letting the magic work or, what they refer to as, jumping ahead of the work.
This article seems to advocate the opposite by being proactive, which is good in a sense because the magician wants to see and feel the magic working, but bad also because if taking action is required to move things along, then magic is probably not needed anyway.
The method described here means the magician is responsible for the outcome, but what if a client hires BWS for a working? Often it’s because there isn’t anything the client CAN do and has exhausted all tangible options.
This just feels like another disappointing Catch 22!