The Aix-en-Provence possessions refer to a series of events in the 17th century involving alleged cases of demonic possession in Aix-en-Provence, France. This phenomenon was particularly notable during the years 1611 to 1612 and involved several young women, primarily from the same family.

  • Place: France
  • Time Period: 17th Century
  • Target/s – Nuns

The events occurred during a period marked by religious tension and superstition, with the Catholic Church actively involved in identifying and addressing cases of witchcraft and possession.

The Aix-en-Provence possessions were a series of alleged cases of demonic possession occurring among the Ursuline nuns of Aix-en-Provence (South of France) in 1611.

Father Louis Gaufridi was accused and convicted of causing the possession by a pact with the devil, and he was executed by being burned at the stake, atop a pile of bushes because they burned slower and hotter than logs.

This case provided the legal precedent for the conviction and execution of Urbain Grandier at Loudun more than 20 years later. In both cases, sexual themes dominated the manifestations of the possessions.

The Possessions

  1. Initial Incidents:
    • The possession began with a few young women, notably a group that included the famous case of Sister Madeleine de la Croix, a nun who exhibited strange behaviors.
    • They displayed symptoms such as convulsions, hallucinations, and speaking in strange tongues, which were interpreted as signs of demonic influence.
  2. Public Spectacle:
    • The incidents attracted significant public attention and were treated as a spectacle, drawing crowds who were fascinated by the phenomena.
    • The local clergy and authorities became involved, leading to public exorcisms and other rituals aimed at driving out the demons.
  3. Role of the Church:
    • The Church played a critical role in investigating the cases. Several priests were called to perform exorcisms, and detailed records of the events were kept.
    • Notable figures, such as Father François de la Chaise, were involved in the exorcisms, which were often conducted with dramatic fervor.
  4. Further Developments:
    • As the situation escalated, more individuals claimed to be possessed, leading to a broader panic and a series of exorcisms conducted in public settings.
    • The possessions were often intertwined with accusations of witchcraft, and some individuals were scrutinized for potential involvement in sorcery or diabolical practices.

Outcomes

  • Investigations: The local magistrates and clergy conducted thorough investigations into the claims. Many of the possessed women underwent rigorous examinations.
  • Doubt and Skepticism: Over time, some began to question the authenticity of the possessions. Skeptics suggested that the behavior exhibited was likely a combination of mass hysteria, psychological stress, and the influence of societal expectations.
  • Cultural Impact: The events contributed to the broader discourse on witchcraft and possession in early modern Europe, influencing how such cases were perceived and handled.

Inquisition at Aix-en-Provence

With the situation at the Ursuline convent getting out of control, Father Romillon enlisted the aid of the Grand Inquisitor Sebastien Michaelis. A Flemish exorcist, Father Domptius, was called upon to continue attempts at removing the demons from the possessed nuns.
After Vérin[who?] accused Father Gaufridi of causing Madeleine’s possession, reporting to the amazed exorcist Father Domptius that 666 demons were in possession of her body, Gaufridi was summoned from his parish to exorcise Sister Louise Capeau. For his efforts, the priest was rewarded with denouncement as a sorcerer and cannibal. To the dangerous accusation, Gaufridi replied, “If I were a witch, I would certainly give my soul to a thousand devils.” Taken by the inquisitors as a confession of guilt, Gaufridi was immediately imprisoned.
During this time, the possessed Sister Louise Capeau insisted loudly that Gaufridi had committed every imaginable form of sexual perversion, alarming authorities into searching the priest’s rooms for magical books or objects. They found nothing incriminating, and were told by his parish that he was a well regarded man.
After being released to his parish, Father Gaufridi demanded his name be cleared and that his accusers be punished. The Grand Inquisitor remained determined that he would bring Gaufridi to trial. In 1611 Gaufridi was brought before a court in Aix.

Trial at Aix-en-Provence

Court proceedings saw both Sisters Madeline and Louise behave in, according to 17th century standards, a fashion typical of an advanced state of possession. Madeleine in particular was seen to maniacally swing from violently denouncing Gaufridi as a devil worshipper and sorcerer to retracting the accusations. She would return to charges of cannibalism, and then turn to begging him for a single word of kindness. Twice, Madeleine attempted suicide after the courts found the Devil’s Mark on her body.
Father Gaufridi entered the courtroom after a series of physical and mental torture inflicted during his time in prison. His body had been shaved in a search for the Devil’s Mark, three of which were found and used as evidence against him. A pact with the Devil was produced in court, allegedly signed by Gaufridi’s own blood.

A confession was also produced, which Gaufridi had signed in prison, extracted under torture. Included in the confession was an admission of celebrating a Black Mass in order to gain power over women:

“More than a thousand persons have been poisoned by the irresistible attraction of my breath which filled them with passion. The Lady of la Palud, the mother of Madeleine, was fascinated like so many others. But Madeleine was taken with an unreasoned love and abandoned herself to me both in the Sabbath and outside the Sabbath…I was marked at the Sabbath of my contentment and I had Madeleine marked on her head, on her belly, on her legs, on her thighs, on her feet…”

In court, Father Gaufridi strongly recanted the confession extracted from him by torture. In the eyes of the court and 17th century Christians, the protest was useless: the signed confession and alleged pact were evidence weighty enough to sentence the priest to death by fire. Even after the sentence was given, inquisitors continued to demand the names of Gaufridi’s accomplices.

The sentence of Aix-en-Provence

April 30, 1611 was the day of Father Gaufridi’s execution. With head and feet bare, a rope around his neck, Gaufridi officially asked pardon of God and was handed over to torturers. Still living after the torture of strappado and squassation, Gaufridi was escorted by archers while dragged through the streets of Aix for five hours before arriving at the place of execution. The priest was granted the mercy of strangulation before his body was burned to ashes.

Sister Madeleine Demandolx de la Palud renounced God and the saints before the church, going so far as to renounce all prayers ever said on her behalf and immediately following Gaufridi’s execution was suddenly free of all possession. Her fellow demoniac, Sister Louise Capeau, was possessed until she died. Both of the sisters were banished from the convent, but Madeleine remained under the watch of the Inquisition. She was charged with witchcraft in 1642 and again in 1652. During her second trial, Madeleine was again found to have the Devil’s mark and was sentenced to imprisonment. At an advanced age, she was released to the custody of a relative and died in 1670 at the age of 77.

Aix-en-Provence sets precedent

The Aix case was the first in which the testimony of an allegedly possessed person was taken into account. Prior to the 17th century, a demonically possessed (demoniac) person was considered unreliable when they laid accusations because most clerics believed that any words spoken by the demoniac were from the mouth of “the father of lies” (John 8:44). By its very nature, the utterances of a demoniac was not considered able to stand up as evidence.
The hysteria begun at Aix did not end with Gaufridi’s sentence and the banishment of the nuns. In 1613, two years later, the possession hysteria spread to Lille where three nuns reported that Sister Marie de Sains had bewitched them. Sister Marie’s testimony was a near copy of Sister Madeleine’s renouncement two years earlier.

More than 20 years later, in 1634, the Aix-en-Provence possessions set precedent for the conviction and execution of Urbain Grandier.

 

Leave a Reply